From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:50:45 -0400
From: Bhanu Nagendra Pisupati <bpisupat@cs.indiana.edu>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <mailman.1007.1244590421.1513.9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906101839480.12746@tank.cs.indiana.edu>
References: <mailman.1007.1244590421.1513.9fans@9fans.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [9fans] critique of sockets API
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 08ab9e98-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


> Did you do this on Plan 9 or bring some of the filesystem sanity of another OS?

Actually my work was based on 9P based synthetic filesystems
implemented using Npfs (see
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcb7zf48_503q8j84)

These filesystems resided in resource constrained embedded devices which
could not run Plan 9 in whole.