9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bhanu Nagendra Pisupati <bpisupat@cs.indiana.edu>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] critique of sockets API
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:46:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906101942520.27591@tank.cs.indiana.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.1.1244635201.19660.9fans@9fans.net>


> perhaps you think this is doging the question, but the cannonical
> plan 9 approach to this is to note that it's easy (trivial) to have a n
> reader threads and m worker threads s.t. i/o threads don't block

I'll agree. With multi threading the network read/write operations
could be pipelined to minimize the overhead.



       reply	other threads:[~2009-06-10 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.1.1244635201.19660.9fans@9fans.net>
2009-06-10 23:46 ` Bhanu Nagendra Pisupati [this message]
     [not found] <mailman.1.1244808001.26495.9fans@9fans.net>
2009-06-13  1:39 ` Bhanu Nagendra Pisupati
     [not found] <b0a72b5826eb44300d3603f585859910@quanstro.net>
2009-06-11 14:54 ` Eris Discordia
2009-06-11 18:24   ` erik quanstrom
2009-06-11 21:21     ` Eris Discordia
2009-06-11 23:41       ` erik quanstrom
2009-06-12  4:32         ` Paul Lalonde
2009-06-12  7:19         ` Eris Discordia
     [not found]     ` <D9FE8C51EE2D568C05E555DD@192.168.1.2>
2009-06-11 23:34       ` Devon H. O'Dell
2009-06-12  7:21         ` Eris Discordia
2009-06-11 12:16 erik quanstrom
     [not found] <mailman.1007.1244590421.1513.9fans@9fans.net>
2009-06-10 22:50 ` Bhanu Nagendra Pisupati
2009-06-11 12:34   ` erik quanstrom
     [not found] <mailman.998.1244574121.1513.9fans@9fans.net>
2009-06-09 23:20 ` Bhanu Nagendra Pisupati
2009-06-09 23:24   ` J.R. Mauro
2009-06-09 23:33   ` Devon H. O'Dell
2009-06-10  3:33     ` Gary Wright
2009-06-10  0:07   ` erik quanstrom
2009-06-10  0:34     ` erik quanstrom
2009-06-11  7:07     ` Eris Discordia
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-09 18:49 Bhanu Nagendra Pisupati
2009-06-09 18:59 ` erik quanstrom
2009-06-09 22:11 ` Russ Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0906101942520.27591@tank.cs.indiana.edu \
    --to=bpisupat@cs.indiana.edu \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).