From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juhani Forsman To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Performance In-Reply-To: <3AF8D73E.999321CB@edb.ericsson.se> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 11:43:42 +0300 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9ca3fb9c-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 i'm also working with this issue by comparing cluster of cpu servers with beowulf cluster and real smp/mpp boxes and i'll send the url of results to 9fans after the work is completed. On Wed, 9 May 2001, Franklin Robert Araujo França wrote: > In fact, I had studied about Plan 9 performance against Linux and Sun OS. I > have a paper with all the results. That paper is one of the results of my > Master Thesis. The advisor for this Thesis was Professor Ph.D Celio > Guimaraes. I'll send the results for this list as soon as possible. > > > presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote: > > > Not that i know of > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Subject: [9fans] Performance > > Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 10:42:15 -0700 > > From: "Fariborz 'Skip' Tavakkolian" > > Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu > > To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu > > > > Are there any published performance numbers more recent than those > > mentioned in 9 and net papers? Any for typical PC platforms compared > > to Linux or FreeBSD? > > > >