From: tlaronde@polynum.com
To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: APE:sys/time.h: long instead of suseconds_t
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 20:30:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWh3Tgv0Gob2Zbdj@polynum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL6pNZ9AkGZkg4N+cLix3ELS543qAtsdb0ecXru9NRHaQpqO7A@mail.gmail.com>
Le Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 06:11:54PM +0000, Conor Williams a écrit :
> surely you can shift a 64 bit long?
>
In fact, I have read cursorily the man page and misread "the time is
expressed in seconds and microseconds since EPOCH" to mean "expressed
in seconds AND expressed in microseconds" while there is a structure
because there is the integer (seconds) part and the fractional
(microseconds) part. Hum...
So, yes, the result (in microseconds) can be hold in a long long.
And for long instead of suseconds_t, I'm probably the only one who will
ever directly use suseconds_t in the code for a variable thinking it is
like the result of nsec(2) and it is probably a type that will never
appear in real user code.
So let this RIP.
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 6:04 PM <tlaronde@polynum.com> wrote:
>
> > Le Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 07:56:37PM +0200, tlaronde a écrit :
> > > As suggested by ori@eigenstate.org, I have used gettimeofday(2) to
> > > achieve what I needed.
> > >
> > > But I had to change suseconds_t (in POSIX) to long (in Plan9
> > > ape/include/sys/time.h).
> > >
> > > But are all the compilers in Plan9 making long an octabytes, whatever
> > > the arch and the machine? Because a long, if it is a tetra, will never
> > > hold the value...
> >
> > I misread: the microseconds are for the fractional part. I was still
> > focusing on nsec() and taking the one for the other.
> >
> > But the following still holds:
> >
> > >
> > > Furthermore, for portability, there should be a typedef associating
> > > suseconds_t to long (or vlong, if long is not guaranteed to be an
> > > octa).
> > >
> > --
> > Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
> > http://www.kergis.com/
> > http://kertex.kergis.com/
> > http://www.sbfa.fr/
> > Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C
--
Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
http://www.kergis.com/
http://kertex.kergis.com/
http://www.sbfa.fr/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C
------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T232b7176352c012b-M86b19184ee7cf17b00f55809
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-14 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-14 17:56 [9fans] " tlaronde
2021-10-14 18:02 ` [9fans] " tlaronde
2021-10-14 18:11 ` Conor Williams
2021-10-14 18:30 ` tlaronde [this message]
2021-10-14 18:48 ` Conor Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YWh3Tgv0Gob2Zbdj@polynum.com \
--to=tlaronde@polynum.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).