From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 13:58:49 +0000
From: Doug NoNum Henderson <d1j2hender@telus3planet.net4>
Message-ID: <_XmA5.2206$24.937800@news0.telusplanet.net>
References: <3.0.5.32.20000926010424.00abd100@mail.real.com>, <970010357.24790.0.nnrp-14.c2decf94@news.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Is there a list for Limbo/Inferno discussion?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 10e46560-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

I like the threading in news. And, when the discussion gets interesting, I
can back track without messing with the mail archiver.
I find I have more control over my news reading time than mail reading time.
Mail seems much more immediate, even though I filter mine into seperate
inboxes.
I can read news safely from multiple locations, home/office/mobile, and
different os's W98/linux/limbo/plan9. I try to limit reading mail to my main
machine.

<forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:970010357.24790.0.nnrp-14.c2decf94@news.demon.co.uk...
> i was originally hoping to stick to usenet for open inferno/limbo
discussion, because
> i like the public nature and the threading of articles, but it begins to
look
> as though that's not adequate.  i'm setting up lists for Inferno and Limbo
now.
> i think it will be hard to gateway between them and usenet, but with luck
i'm wrong.
> does anyone care?