From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Hello Assembly
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:38:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a02840302058fd6b36eadf00cc91961b@quanstro.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13426df10802090827m3d6447cxe07052f07263f5bc@mail.gmail.com>
> if you love assembly code, the assembler on Plan 9 is not great.
>
> If you love assembly code, you are in need of a CAT scan in my view.
>
> The v6 manual entry for as called assembly code "the ultimate dead
> language". If only that had been true.
>
> gcc and friends have made the world safe for assembly, and there is more
> assembly in use than ever.
>
> Writing assembly code should be as painful as possible. Plan 9
> succeeds in that regard. It's a good thing in my view.
>
> ron
i don't think that it follows from the fact that assembly language
is inappropriately used in a lot of linux software that it should
be as hard to use as possible on plan 9.
there are some tasks that must be in assembly language. and it's
a good tool for learning how the machine works. sometimes, like
on really small controllers, it's the best tool for the job.
just my 2¢.
- erik
p.s. relax ron. i promise not to rewrite plan 9 in assembly language.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-09 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-09 9:44 Anant Narayanan
2008-02-09 9:58 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-02-09 10:09 ` Anant Narayanan
2008-02-09 10:15 ` erik quanstrom
2008-02-09 10:32 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-02-09 10:34 ` erik quanstrom
2008-02-09 10:36 ` erik quanstrom
2008-02-09 20:15 ` Anant Narayanan
2008-02-09 20:17 ` Anant Narayanan
2008-02-09 14:37 ` Eris Discordia
2008-02-09 16:17 ` Brantley Coile
2008-02-09 16:27 ` ron minnich
2008-02-09 16:38 ` erik quanstrom [this message]
2008-02-09 16:51 ` Brantley Coile
2008-02-10 8:04 ` maht
2008-02-11 16:39 ` john
2008-02-09 17:32 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-02-10 8:18 ` Eris Discordia
2008-02-10 8:56 ` Martin Neubauer
2008-02-10 14:38 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2008-02-10 16:55 ` Anant Narayanan
2008-02-10 18:01 ` erik quanstrom
2008-02-10 18:11 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2008-02-11 2:36 ` Adrian Tritschler
2008-02-11 2:36 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2008-02-11 2:39 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2008-02-11 6:26 ` maht
2008-02-11 2:40 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2008-02-11 2:55 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] <ead6208b996760a9eb2eeccb8c431b12@plan9.bell-labs.com>
2008-02-09 21:15 ` Anant Narayanan
2008-02-09 21:27 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2008-02-10 8:30 ` Anant Narayanan
2008-02-11 16:36 ` john
2008-02-11 16:43 ` erik quanstrom
2008-02-11 16:45 ` john
2008-02-11 19:41 ` Jon Snader
2008-02-11 19:49 ` Pietro Gagliardi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a02840302058fd6b36eadf00cc91961b@quanstro.net \
--to=quanstro@quanstro.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).