From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <a080848bd0f3740879f0f2b3e8e9fe51@terzarima.net>
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 00:16:16 +0000
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101141220540.30792@fryrpg-zna>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 topology
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 98c13c44-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>Did I not allude to that when I used the word "daemon"?

not exactly. one important difference is that a file server in plan 9
"by definition" if you like interprets the 9P protocol.
there's no such guarantee for an arbitrary "daemon".
("That same daemon that hath gulled thee thus.")