From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <a11590ab3e7000c91a2cbcbe2eadc816@9netics.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] secstore plain text dilema
From: 9nut@9netics.com
In-Reply-To: <8b4495f7b7afc80cfdbc78ad0beec22a@hamnavoe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:32:39 -0800
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ea84b862-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>> How about just porting the TLS device to drawterm? (not that adding
>> factotum support wouldn't be useful)
>
> I'm confused:  drawterm talks to cpu, which uses ssl(3) not tls(3) -
> isn't it devssl that needs porting?

I'm thinking of '#a' device, which is explained in tls(3).
Isn't this  it?