From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 20:07:35 +0200 From: "Laurent Malvert" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Newbie Questions In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1180635957.339055.285650@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <14ec7b180706010846s4398c7f0xe89ff2e4e89cdfe@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7791a652-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 6/1/07, Lorenzo Fernando Bivens de la Fuente wrote: > On 6/1/07, Laurent Malvert wrote: > > On 6/1/07, andrey mirtchovski wrote: > > > i find google to be a very good search engine for the wiki: > > > > sure, except that you cannot be sure that google indexed all the pages > > you want, whereas with your own engine you can control that > > completely. > > > > But yes, Google serves its purpose well and I use it for local site > > searching once in a while... when I don't find what I want with the > > site's own search feature. > > It's a great 'general' tool, as a safeguard. > > > > And as far as I know, it can be embedded on any website... And ? I don't see the relation ? Yes we could add the embedded google searchbar, it would still use the same google site: feature. I am talking about the way the pages are being indexed. You can tell the google robot to skip some pages (like kris maglione suggests for the diffs) or to not index files contained in a given folder, for instance. But you cannot do the opposite: force it to index specific pages of a website. That's the point I was talking about: your own embedded search engine indexes what you tell him to. -- Laurent Malvert [laurent.malvert@gmail.com] {EPITECH.} - EuroPean Institute of TECHnology