From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: From: David Presotto To: lucio@proxima.alt.za, 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] "part 772" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-qkspnmevkvftibmnnbpgfamzct" Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 08:49:06 -0500 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6eeefd62-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-qkspnmevkvftibmnnbpgfamzct Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I rechecked the country list. I was afraid France, Germany, NYC and San Francisco might have been moved to the banned list these last few weeks but neither in nor the goveernment end-use list has changed. If anyone can find a pointer on what treaties define the EU+8 that allowed government end-use of US encryption software, I'll stick a pointer on the page. Without checking the lists closely, it looks like the EU+8 covers NATO members plus US pacific allies. --upas-qkspnmevkvftibmnnbpgfamzct Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.9.2]) by plan9; Sun Feb 23 08:11:25 EST 2003 Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by plan9; Sun Feb 23 08:11:23 EST 2003 Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.30.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 4159C19A8B; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 08:11:14 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: from cackle.proxima.alt.za (cackle.proxima.alt.za [196.30.44.141]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 7C2D219A70 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 08:10:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from cackle.proxima.alt.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cackle.proxima.alt.za (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h1NDACmt025481 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:10:13 +0200 (SAST) Received: (from lucio@localhost) by cackle.proxima.alt.za (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h1NDACYp025480 for 9fans@cse.psu.edu; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:10:12 +0200 (SAST) From: Lucio De Re To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] "part 772" Message-ID: <20030223151011.A15898@cackle.proxima.alt.za> Mail-Followup-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu References: <19f1d7d62eeee96cea27167325b8db79@plan9.bell-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <19f1d7d62eeee96cea27167325b8db79@plan9.bell-labs.com>; from David Presotto on Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 08:03:59AM -0500 Organization: Proxima Research & Development Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Reply-To: lucio@proxima.alt.za List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:10:11 +0200 On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 08:03:59AM -0500, David Presotto wrote: > > Sorry about that, fixed. Not that it's a very exciting document > to look at, but every other security disclaimer page mentions it > so I thought it was worth seeing what it meant. > I was merely curious about New Zealand being exempted, when its armament legislation forbids docking to US (and other) nuclear powered ships. Ideally, if New Zealand and many others are exempted, I see little reason for South Africa not to request exemption too. Of course, I have no idea what's involved, but if our government is looking for yet another alternative to monopoly software, I'd be glad to help them along. ++L --upas-qkspnmevkvftibmnnbpgfamzct--