From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <a2b0eb1703613a28b2cb4f2f6d1ffac7@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] how to make coexit fossil+venti and fs
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307162354330.6875-100000@fbsd.cpsc.ucalgary.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:43:25 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f9828b6a-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>> If the fossil+venti is believed to be robust as comparable as
>> release 4 file server, I have no hesitation on this decision.

Well, in may case, it has proven to be as robust.
We have being using it during a whole semester in production.

We have replaced our 3rd ed. worm (which is now spare) with a venti/fossil/fs
server.