From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 13:29:23 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <a3b937311c3c09f698cc70b455642d6d@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOw7k5h-y4-zBC5KOkeqLypLAp9rDouLj8r5Eok8EvxOhLhdCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <063412cb21a6433d959274d7db87d242@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<92606a17ce255a2e74049e4090d948b3@proxima.alt.za>
	<CAOw7k5h-y4-zBC5KOkeqLypLAp9rDouLj8r5Eok8EvxOhLhdCw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] syscall 53
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e888f5da-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> On 19 May 2014 18:13, <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote:
>
> > Curiously, I'm pretty certain that it was the issue of an fd that
> > remained open (something to do with caching the /dev/time fd, if I
> > remember right) that caused some tests to fall apart, probably because
> > a test for leaking fds actually needed to cache the time of day for
> > time out purposes.
> >
>
> That was entirely the result of a botched attempt to optimise something.
> Remove that botched optimisation, and that problem goes away.

+1, or rather, exactly.

- erik