* [9fans] pccpu vs pccpuf vs...
@ 2006-12-14 1:55 Joel Salomon
2006-12-15 7:34 ` Sergey Zhilkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Salomon @ 2006-12-14 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
What is the difference between all the kernel configurations? I know
pccpu is for a cpu server and pccpuf is for a cpu server with fossil,
but there seem to be other ifferneces (vga, mouse) than seem required
for fossil use. Is pccpu just older and out-of-date? If so, why is
the 9pccpu kernel pre-compiled in /386 and not the 9pccpuf?
--Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] pccpu vs pccpuf vs...
2006-12-14 1:55 [9fans] pccpu vs pccpuf vs Joel Salomon
@ 2006-12-15 7:34 ` Sergey Zhilkin
2006-12-16 8:39 ` sretzki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Zhilkin @ 2006-12-15 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 616 bytes --]
Hi
pccpu - kernel for diskless CPU server (one of two)
pccpuf - kernel for CPU server with fossil (single CPU/AUTH/FS)
read - http://cm.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/9.html
2006/12/14, Joel Salomon <joelcsalomon@gmail.com>:
>
> What is the difference between all the kernel configurations? I know
> pccpu is for a cpu server and pccpuf is for a cpu server with fossil,
> but there seem to be other ifferneces (vga, mouse) than seem required
> for fossil use. Is pccpu just older and out-of-date? If so, why is
> the 9pccpu kernel pre-compiled in /386 and not the 9pccpuf?
>
> --Joel
>
--
С Уважением
Жилкин Сергей
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 997 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] pccpu vs pccpuf vs...
2006-12-15 7:34 ` Sergey Zhilkin
@ 2006-12-16 8:39 ` sretzki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sretzki @ 2006-12-16 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> Hi
> pccpu - kernel for diskless CPU server (one of two)
> pccpuf - kernel for CPU server with fossil (single CPU/AUTH/FS)
>
He answered that hisself one sentence later, it was not the point of his post. Too bad I cannot answer Joels question, though I found it to be interesting, too.
> read - http://cm.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/9.html
>
> 2006/12/14, Joel Salomon <joelcsalomon@gmail.com>:
>>
>> What is the difference between all the kernel configurations? I know
>> pccpu is for a cpu server and pccpuf is for a cpu server with fossil,
>> but there seem to be other ifferneces (vga, mouse) than seem required
>> for fossil use. Is pccpu just older and out-of-date? If so, why is
>> the 9pccpu kernel pre-compiled in /386 and not the 9pccpuf?
>>
>> --Joel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> С Уважением
> Жилкин Сергей
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-12-16 8:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-12-14 1:55 [9fans] pccpu vs pccpuf vs Joel Salomon
2006-12-15 7:34 ` Sergey Zhilkin
2006-12-16 8:39 ` sretzki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).