From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] pccpu vs pccpuf vs... From: sretzki@gmx.de Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:39:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <126a2f7d0612142334u49272387l5059c191bf8b342@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Topicbox-Message-UUID: f54570b6-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Hi > pccpu - kernel for diskless CPU server (one of two) > pccpuf - kernel for CPU server with fossil (single CPU/AUTH/FS) >=20 He answered that hisself one sentence later, it was not the point of his = post. Too bad I cannot answer Joels question, though I found it to be int= eresting, too. > read - http://cm.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/9.html >=20 > 2006/12/14, Joel Salomon : >> >> What is the difference between all the kernel configurations? I know >> pccpu is for a cpu server and pccpuf is for a cpu server with fossil, >> but there seem to be other ifferneces (vga, mouse) than seem required >> for fossil use. Is pccpu just older and out-of-date? If so, why is >> the 9pccpu kernel pre-compiled in /386 and not the 9pccpuf? >> >> --Joel >> >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > =D0=A1 =D0=A3=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=B6=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=BC > =D0=96=D0=B8=D0=BB=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=BD =D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9