From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <a4e6962a05053013431dd2d94a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 15:43:35 -0500
From: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 on the Cell...
In-Reply-To: <7e49ab82bc2c5d046728dafcc50bc6b8@terzarima.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <56a2970005052823352850a75e@mail.gmail.com>
	<7e49ab82bc2c5d046728dafcc50bc6b8@terzarima.net>
Cc: 
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 584d4730-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 5/29/05, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
> >>What would a g5 port entail?
>=20
> a fair bit of kernel work.
>=20

It could be slightly less.  There are efforts underway to get either
IBM's rhyper or Xen-ppc to boot on the G5.  This would simplify the
driver support, but we'd still need to do a lot of work to support
hypervisor based mmu.

           -eric