From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <a4e6962a050711122327252f90@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:23:01 -0500
From: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 8c question
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507101853241.12286@enigma.lanl.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <eaf7ffeb94093a1af9c5b04c2c0aa4f9@terzarima.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0507101853241.12286@enigma.lanl.gov>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 63f2486a-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 7/10/05, Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov> wrote:
>=20
> What we're lacking is anyone with a time to write the proof-of-concept
> implementation. I wish we could get it done, because the inter-domain
> comms in xen just keep getting more and more complex.
>=20

Now that he has recover more or less working, Gorka is going to take a
look at this.  Burning a Xen CD for him right now.  A question for you
Ron - would it be bad to prototype on the more stable Xen 2.0?  I'd
hate to waste time if too much of the device channel interface is
chaning for 3.0...

            -eric