From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:07:08 -0600 From: Eric Van Hensbergen To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] fuse bashing In-Reply-To: <43D5123E.1070001@lanl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060123170614.07D331E8C37@holo.morphisms.net> <43D5123E.1070001@lanl.gov> Topicbox-Message-UUID: e426081e-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 1/23/06, Ronald G Minnich wrote: > In fact, fuse may be just good enough, and v9fs came in just late > enough, that in the long term, fuse is what "wins" on linux, in the > sense that most people may end up using fuse, since there are already > pretty good examples for people to follow. We'll see. > Lucho's made some good progress on this front. We've proposed a tutorial at OLS (which may also generate a DeveloperWorks tutorial) which will cover how to write synthetic file systems for 9P and also cover some of the tradeoffs between 9P and FUSE. -eric