From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:30:02 -0500 From: "Eric Van Hensbergen" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: Inferno on OLPC? (was Re: [9fans] *poof*) In-Reply-To: <2b977395580f363d7a1fadde4dc3c26f@vitanuova.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7a33156a1f7ff4688152051f59aecefc@quanstro.net> <2b977395580f363d7a1fadde4dc3c26f@vitanuova.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6bc6c060-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 6/16/06, rog@vitanuova.com wrote: > > The other issue is that, evidently, you can't build inferno under inferno. > > are there sufficient resources on the OLPC to build (say) Linux inside Linux? > The right question is, at 10-15W per child, how long will it take a child with a crank to power a full Linux build.... Of course, no local disk may also be a factor there.... -eric