From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:14:58 -0600 From: "Eric Van Hensbergen" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Question about v9fs on Gentoo In-Reply-To: <45DDDD82.80208@tecmav.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45DDD6F6.8060609@tecmav.com> <13426df10702220952h6ce1c6e1hd6169e182190e39@mail.gmail.com> <45DDDD82.80208@tecmav.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 12894fc6-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 2/22/07, Adriano Verardo wrote: > ron minnich wrote: > > Sorry, I was saying ... > > I tried both "9p" and "9P". > > I don't know whether or not there is a specialized mount utils, > as in FreeBSD. > > If not, IMHO, mount should recognize the available fs from /proc. > 9p is not listed in /proc/filesystem, also when statically linked in the > kernel. I think It should be. > If there is no 9p, 9p2000, or 9P in /proc/filesystems, there is something wrong with the way you have built your kernel or kernel module. When you compile it as a module and than insmod it, do you see anything funny in /var/log/messages or dmesg? -eric