From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <a4e6962a0711051025k2d5cd608q43a2125770a4a794@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon,  5 Nov 2007 12:25:17 -0600
From: "Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: device-specific qid.version behaviour (was Re: [9fans] QTCTL?)
In-Reply-To: <5b38ebbfff57fcd6da3f1cc282684bc4@9netics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <7e65325a0cd907feca744c030f025319@quanstro.net>
	<5b38ebbfff57fcd6da3f1cc282684bc4@9netics.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e99dcbd6-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 11/5/07, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote:
>
> maybe 9p2010 Tread/Twrite could include the qid, which may be
> supplied by the client (or left out).  if qid is supplied then the fs
> has the option to enforce it; otherwise it works as it does now.
>

Confused as to what you are saying here - could you clarify?

         -eric