9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] crosstool fails on gentoo
Date: Mon,  2 Jun 2008 15:09:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4e6962a0806021309q7cfecd0fx946d9eed831f9acc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13426df10806021255y4122f46h34a88ebb8480f29e@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:55 PM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I keep reviewing papers that want to simplify things by ... adding
> another layer of software!
>

That's a really great observation.  I see it all the time as well, for
some reason simplification has come to mean add new layers of
abstraction.  But it is a false simplification, it may simplify the
API, but the overall system complexity increases (and usually lead to
a decrease in system efficiency).  All productivity factors become
harder (development may be easier, but debugging, performance
debugging, and management typically become more difficult).

Someone really needs to remind folks that "system simplification"
involves a reduction in the number of layers, not an increase in them.

             -eric



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-02 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <483D8DBE.4090005@cableone.net>
     [not found] ` <200805282337.11349.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
2008-06-01 15:12   ` Enrico Weigelt
2008-06-02 19:25     ` Uriel
2008-06-02 19:55       ` ron minnich
2008-06-02 19:57         ` erik quanstrom
2008-06-02 20:09         ` Eric Van Hensbergen [this message]
2008-06-02 20:37           ` Uriel
2008-06-02 20:45             ` erik quanstrom
2008-06-02 21:00               ` Uriel
2008-06-02 22:32             ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-06-02 23:00               ` Iruata Souza
2008-06-02 23:21                 ` ron minnich
2008-06-03  0:50                   ` Iruata Souza
2008-06-03  0:54                     ` erik quanstrom
2008-06-03  2:02                       ` Nick LaForge
2008-06-05 11:11     ` Enrico Weigelt
2008-06-05 11:21       ` Bruce Ellis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a4e6962a0806021309q7cfecd0fx946d9eed831f9acc@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ericvh@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).