From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <9ab217670904240654oda15962sceba657be9b6a18@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:12:05 -0500 Message-ID: From: Eric Van Hensbergen To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] IWP9 this year? Topicbox-Message-UUID: f1cbe804-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Seconded - I vote for a movement until 1Q10, I think you'll get a lot more industry participation this way. -eric On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Latchesar Ionkov wrote: > There were some ideas of skipping this year and making the next IWP9 > in the beginning of the next year. End of the year is a difficult time > for travel, the budgets for travel are depleted, or not if the fiscal > year starts earlier than the calendar one, not defined well enough. > > =A0 =A0Lucho > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Devon H. O'Dell = wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Although I probably won't be able to go unless it's close (a.k.a. in >> the Baltimore / Washington DC area -- which actually isn't perhaps a >> bad idea?), the subject of an IWP9 has been brought up several times >> this year. I'd like to get the ball rolling on this, in case anybody >> is interested in setting it up or attending. I think the question at >> this point is, ``Who wants to organize it, and who will attend?'' >> >> I'm perfectly fine to organize the event, and I'm sure my office could >> more than accommodate any interested attendees. Just kind of curious >> what timeframes people would be interested in, and whether people >> would be able / willing to come. If not, some discussion on the when >> and where might not be a bad idea, anyway. Let me know! >> >> --Devon >> >> > >