From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3ec2e3c33c26f69a1ac8fa3c807997f4@quanstro.net>
References: <a560a5d00903040614j12be4617g8870f2c4710e3010@mail.gmail.com>
	<3ec2e3c33c26f69a1ac8fa3c807997f4@quanstro.net>
Date: Wed,  4 Mar 2009 15:59:37 +0100
Message-ID: <a560a5d00903040659t78680af9hf4cf30939dbc91e1@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] command repetition in sam/acme
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b0b6a2b4-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> i disagree with your premise that only vim has the vigor to
> modify your super special file. =A0all you need is f and f*.
> f transforms your source into something easy to edit in acme.
> f* transforms it back into the original form. =A0easy peasy.
> or, you can write a simple program that edits the file
> directly. =A0there are so many ways to do this, and i'm just
> too lazy to list them all.
>
> - erik

Alright. Such 'f, f*'  has already been proposed and shown, most
clearly, by yy at the beginning of this thread.
I agree it is functional and perhaps sufficient for now.
Let's consider this finished.
(Until I come up with some even more compelling argument in favor of
counted repetition...)

Ruda