From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <aa94b99dd5c8340b9625597e062fcb3b@ladd.quanstro.net>
References: <aa94b99dd5c8340b9625597e062fcb3b@ladd.quanstro.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:25:49 +0200
Message-ID: <a560a5d00910181525q6d5cd8e0y4b4c401a60051aa7@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] fmt(1) standard behaviour
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 89f35252-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I may not fully understand the problem, but wouldn't it be just fine
if fmt output anything it can already output?
I.e., filled lines are output, on encountering '\n' the (generally
unfilled) line is output...
(Or what is the reason that fmt waits for EOF?)

R