From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a560a5d00910211241l6307cbe8m4bfe50e6b85f060d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a560a5d00910211052q2995c2afoae585c94f555947b@mail.gmail.com>
	<dd6fe68a0910211147n56655babse510d8fc02112582@mail.gmail.com>
	<a560a5d00910211241l6307cbe8m4bfe50e6b85f060d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:48:23 +0200
Message-ID: <a560a5d00910211248t6c478634o5b1039265dfcef84@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] bison problem, not plan9 related
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8dcb7f8a-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> So the %nonassoc says to the parser that
> (REP block) ATOM
> is the right decision as opposed to
> REP (block ATOM)
> right?

... probably not exactly. the highest priority of ATOM is probably
also important, as I think of it now...

Ruda