From: Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Shall we fix the use of Up/Dn arrows?
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:52:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a560a5d01001230452p35494b9fle8b10223b8045861@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7aee91501001230115q5285b2ebyd2df99db84f6855d@mail.gmail.com>
> 1. We use Lf/Rt arrows to move the cursor, don't we? Then use Up/Dn to do the same kind of task is symmetric, and thus more reasonable.
In case of being in an editor, editing some text, I'd say your idea
has a point. Also I find it disturbing when instead of moving up one
line the scrolling comes instead.
On the other hand, being in a rio window or an acme win window, moving
the cursor up or down using the arrows doesn't have much sense (in any
case you have to use a mouse to do something useful with a text
there).
What I'd appreciate, from the user's point of view, would be some kind
of history mechanism tied to the up/down keys in rio/win (where I
interact with a shell), up arrow bringing up the last command e.g.,
and a normal movement behaviour when editing a 'text' file (no direct
interaction with the shell, where 'enter' is just a newline).
On the other hand, implementing such a mechanism would probably lead
to ugly complications, which might be better be avoided. For now,
simplicity wins.
Btw., I know the " and "" scripts by R Cox, I use them. Without
something like them, it would be hell. Anyhow, hitting the up/down key
a few times is just quicker.
R
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-23 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-23 9:15 Yi DAI
2010-01-23 9:35 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-01-23 9:59 ` Bela Valek
2010-01-23 10:21 ` John Stalker
2010-01-23 14:29 ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-23 12:37 ` cinap_lenrek
2010-01-23 12:52 ` Rudolf Sykora [this message]
2010-01-23 13:07 ` Yi DAI
2010-01-23 17:13 ` blstuart
2010-01-23 19:01 ` Rudolf Sykora
2010-01-25 17:20 ` maht
2010-01-26 11:50 ` Rudolf Sykora
2010-01-26 12:26 ` yy
2010-01-26 12:34 ` Robert Raschke
2010-01-26 14:16 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-23 19:10 ` Russ Cox
2010-01-23 19:25 ` Rudolf Sykora
2010-01-24 0:53 ` Russ Cox
2010-01-24 7:08 ` Frederik Caulier
2010-01-24 9:08 ` Yi DAI
2010-01-24 18:03 ` Tim Newsham
2010-01-24 22:28 ` Charles Forsyth
2010-01-24 18:41 ` John Floren
2010-01-25 9:46 ` Pavel Klinkovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a560a5d01001230452p35494b9fle8b10223b8045861@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rudolf.sykora@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).