From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <a5720f2885b52706437c08b8a30ff76c@juice.thebigchoice.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] spam
From: matt@proweb.co.uk
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309240954350.26417-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:12:10 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 473c52aa-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025


> this discussion has come full circle. The whole point of what we're doing
> is to try out an SMTP-free mail system. I don't want anonymous messages

I thought the point of the CPUing was to cut out the anonymous messages


> I don't want their messages in my pipeto. I want them locked out.

my point was that once you've the them through the gate via CPU/import
then they should use the normal channels to continue to deliver the
message, not have write access to some mailbox file.  Unless, of
course, you are proposing to drop the RFC 2822 format ?