From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:57:15 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <20100415182618.GA9844@polynum.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] APE: a further note. Topicbox-Message-UUID: 02b2d0a0-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu Apr 15 14:52:12 EDT 2010, benavento@gmail.com wrote: > -T with in APE for lunix code doesn't cut it without hand > editing tons of it, there's always a function prototype > missing or even conflicting... hand depending on the > size of the project it can be unmanageable... excellent reason to avoid linux code. if there are specific problems with ape that don't allow -T to work correctly, they should be fixed. i haven't done much with ape recently, except getting an updated version of the One True Awk working with no spurious floating point exceptions. - erik