From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <a5e5dcc8bae684a61a1112a8f0504870@rei2.9hal>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:01:00 +0200
From: cinap_lenrek@gmx.de
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <ae899daacadcc33efd8123ea3529335c@rei2.9hal>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] rfork(RFPROC|RFNOMNT)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: afc63132-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

small additional note. RFPROC|RFNOMNT alone makes no difference
of course as parent and child will share the same pgrp. but
with RFNAMEG or RFCNAMEG it makes a difference.

the number of programs that use this combination is probably
very small. it was triggered with irc7 which is not part of
the plan9 distribution.

--
cinap