From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <a64622a14678bf8e85aca22e1f687f32@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Got thread experience?
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:06:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <47210446.1070100@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d981e106-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>> under plan 9, don't we call those processes?
>> 
>> that doesn't sound like any imbedded environment i've worked in.
>> it's getting mighty fancy to have one set of pagetables. ;-)
>> 
> 
> You're cute, but I'm trying to be serious.
> It's an odd question, I know.

well although i was being funny, the point was serious.
what you describe -- loci of execution with seperate address
spaces (page tables) are usually thought of as processes
in unix-like environments.  i would suspect that csp
tools are available like send and recv?

- erik