From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:14:46 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <13426df10908271217t17b7ae8er8f52f97b222f14b6@mail.gmail.com> References: <4f6575f8c4f2a26270e6bae5ea04960f@quanstro.net> <3e1162e60908270951n2b16dd4by19f58ccd1a97a0ec@mail.gmail.com> <13426df10908271005x1e4196e6lbfd67c4ab78654ea@mail.gmail.com> <5d375e920908271126k1893f3e0q99065d37077621dc@mail.gmail.com> <5d375e920908271148n5ca01308qcb060286b871d222@mail.gmail.com> <13426df10908271157x534a94bbl410bbd4dd99a491b@mail.gmail.com> <5d375e920908271207k4a554940q393bb114c962bdc4@mail.gmail.com> <13426df10908271217t17b7ae8er8f52f97b222f14b6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] new 9atom.iso Topicbox-Message-UUID: 57cf0d70-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Do we stick with that file format forever? is it perfect and never to > be changed? would it be fair to ask a the same question from a little different perspective? could someone explain what the disadvantages and problems with 9fat are? i'm asking out of ignorance, since 9fat hasn't been a problem for me. - erik