From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:49:50 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <a7b3f5e1a677ba1a5823df4f87a613de@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinMrkIBafWVXrlLQmo5lPPRmq-IEqNoyNX-5MIo@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTil4cAbJUFnGfnkVuOamXTaRcs-BfQjNQXPYV2qE@mail.gmail.com>
	<136f4778140ad5331b980f5d45eff3c5@coraid.com>
	<AANLkTimt-N7AHo_3d9sOnHKH-dpDNsD_H0ZzogJ8_EB5@mail.gmail.com>
	<b5d8f679ca37f573d37735ce19235184@coraid.com>
	<AANLkTinMrkIBafWVXrlLQmo5lPPRmq-IEqNoyNX-5MIo@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] regexp doubt
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3eea06ce-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

the problem is that OPERATOR, and nextrec() now collide
with legit runes.

- erik