From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue,  5 Feb 2013 10:28:02 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <a7f14b30aaf2f178736e7b774d1d7a3b@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <1584662.3yckhokRCb@krypton>
References: <09803b4d93511fdb3e2232a9759e5aa8@isd.dp.ua>
	<1584662.3yckhokRCb@krypton>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] APE libsec
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 150aee5c-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue Feb  5 03:42:51 EST 2013, staal1978@gmail.com wrote:
> Sorry if this may sound ignorant and clueless, but would a similar port of the
> Plan9 thread(2) to APE be possible - in particular in a form where stuff are
> exposed through the headers as a standard pthreads solution?
>
> Right now I have noticed that I use GNU Pth extensively under APE, but a more
> "native" pthread implementation would be cool.

we haven't investigated.  you're welcome to try.

the immediate goal is to get hg and python working properly
on all arches we've currently got.  we're desperately trying not
to drag anything else along.

- erik