From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:49:08 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <a9348df34dd4202a1bb2250e182117b4@chula.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOw7k5iYxoVUHYYxf1Dg9ESWwTon_aGFxhNkuyUGbkXwiKO9DA@mail.gmail.c>
References: <CAJ1xhMUwAqtCmJSh3xUVVWS0fhAj4py2LtMfbeVuai2k2o3hzg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOw7k5ifn8knOApHOCY5ZM-8TDJaXKPReHAhB-ZYgSxYFRi7Rw@mail.gmail.com>
	<AAF0C6B4-379A-40C3-97C8-F4A661325359@bitblocks.com>
	<CAE9W7-gXhbmmVw-o6fwTJtr6KNhdmiow3_p-S8=5hz21X7i1uA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CFE0D78F-3C9A-4DB5-A3F2-13A8FC54BD74@bitblocks.com>
	<CAOw7k5iYxoVUHYYxf1Dg9ESWwTon_aGFxhNkuyUGbkXwiKO9DA@mail.gmail.c>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] assembly syntax in plan 9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5e04c5f2-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon Jan 16 14:40:41 EST 2012, charles.forsyth@gmail.com wrote:

> They are compiling C++ which has language-visible exception handling
> instead.
>
> On 16 January 2012 19:03, Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> wrote:
>
> > How do you deal with longjmp?
> >

i thought this wasn't entirely supported, see the "limitations" section.
http://drdobbs.com/184401468

(i had a better reference, but can't find it anymore.)

- erik