From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] NAT
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:29:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9450689cbbd5a81e1442a9e16d563a8@caldo.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2147483647.1064935529@[192.168.42.6]>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
what???
i send messages out and things come back.
what on earth are they doing?
sounds more of a PRAT than a NAT box
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2966 bytes --]
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] NAT
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:25:29 -0600
Message-ID: <2147483647.1064935529@[192.168.42.6]>
On Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:42 PM -0400 vdharani@infernopark.com
wrote:
>> more than a casual interest for me. I'm not particularly trusting of
>> those little NAT firewall boxes that everyone seems so enamored with
>> these days.
> whats wrong with it? I think those boxes works well (and act as
> plug-and- play firewalls).
Only if all[*] of your internal hosts do the uPnP dance with the NAT box.
None of mine do.
--lyndon
[*] Well, the ones that need to communicate with the world at large. In
my case that's all of the hosts on my internal network.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-30 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-30 19:14 Richard C Bilson
2003-09-30 20:42 ` vdharani
2003-09-30 21:25 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2003-09-30 22:29 ` Charles Forsyth [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-16 16:49 [9fans] nat erik quanstrom
2008-11-16 17:28 ` Eris Discordia
2008-11-16 15:09 [9fans] Do we have a catalog of 9P servers? sqweek
2008-11-16 15:22 ` [9fans] nat erik quanstrom
2008-11-16 15:54 ` lucio
2008-11-16 15:52 ` erik quanstrom
2008-11-16 16:21 ` lucio
2008-11-18 5:43 ` Sergey Zhilkin
2003-09-30 19:47 [9fans] NAT Richard C Bilson
2003-09-30 20:13 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-30 18:05 Richard C Bilson
2003-09-30 18:12 ` Brantley Coile
2003-09-30 18:25 ` ynl
2003-09-30 19:44 ` vdharani
2003-09-30 18:36 ` Brantley Coile
2003-09-30 18:39 ` Charles Forsyth
2003-09-30 18:52 ` boyd, rounin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a9450689cbbd5a81e1442a9e16d563a8@caldo.demon.co.uk \
--to=forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).