From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <a94945571995ec9c748ca80622e3d404@9srv.net>
From: a@9srv.net
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] venti ports and productization
In-Reply-To: <53274205034b36c3976ada8f51f9c8c4@plan9.bell-labs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:35:24 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 763acd84-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

that's very interesting. my comment about "why rewrite" wasn't
intended to necessarily imply it should've been done that way,
although i realize it probably came off that way. what about
the current implementation is at issue? and (the big question)
is it expected that the new stuff will be protocol compatable?
=E3=82=A2