From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:04:32 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <a96a099a4301d9f92c38416395ebda8f@brasstown.quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [9fans] openrd mii trouble
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3b1fa5c0-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

i seem to be having some funnies, espcially with port #2.
after turning on debugging, i notice that both port 0 and port
one report they're using the same phy number (blank lines
added for effect below).  does anyone know if this is as
intended, or am i barking up the wrong tree?

- erik

----

Plan 9 from Bell Labs

#F0: nand addr 0xf9000000 len 536870912 width 1 interleave 0
mii
ctlrno 0 phy 8 oui 0x5043 model 0x24
ctlrno 0 phy 24 oui 0x5043 model 0x24
ether1116: dual-port phy
ctlrno 0 using ctlrno 0's phyno 8
>>oui 0x5043 phyno 8
#l0: kirkwoodmii: fd 1 speed 1000 tfc 1 rfc 1
mii done
phy dev addr 0

mii
ctlrno 1 using ctlrno 0's phyno 24
>>oui 0x5043 phyno 8
#l1: kirkwoodmii: fd 1 speed 1000 tfc 1 rfc 1
mii done
phy dev addr 0