From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:52:40 +0800 From: "Rogelio Serrano" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Include guards and multiple includes In-Reply-To: <0f9745ee9350aa326ee154ec58824dac@coraid.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <0f9745ee9350aa326ee154ec58824dac@coraid.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: d2ddc69a-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 10/23/06, erik quanstrom wrote: > uh, ken did. > > - erik How? > > On Mon Oct 23 08:40:40 EDT 2006, rogelio.serrano@gmail.com wrote: > > > > I think this has more to do with minimising the preprocessor logic. I > > like the plan 9 include tree more than the traditional unix include > > mess. In my programs I dont use macros anywhere. none. nada. zero. > > > > If one could only get rid of the preprocessor... > -- the thing i like with my linux pc is that i can sum up my complaints in 5 items