From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 18:29:09 +0800 From: "Rogelio Serrano" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] speaking of kenc In-Reply-To: <463DABD9.1080700@proweb.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <463DABD9.1080700@proweb.co.uk> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5d36fd02-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 5/6/07, matt wrote: > > slow not really > > I don't know what sort of metric you are using but whatever it is, it's > wrong. > i was not saying/claiming that any os is slow. > My PC has gone from 20,000,000hz to 3,000,000,000hz in 10 years. > > How does Vista boot to GUI compare to Win3.1 ? > > To say Vista/OSX/Lunix are not slow is outrageously naive! > they are slow. one is even slower than the other but i can live with it. > and for all you asm arguers I say : Windows 3.x, where would we be > without it's asm goodness ! > -- the thing i like with my linux pc is that i can sum up my complaints in 5 items