From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <aa5097e7d4f1eedef63269d8252c5f15@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:53:44 -0500
From: jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] some recent updates
In-Reply-To: <f90c555a68f06110b1a9e001bfdfaada@hamnavoe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1a12bb4e-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


On Sat Feb 26 07:17:42 EST 2005, 9fans@hamnavoe.com wrote:
> > ethervt6102.c
> > 	replacement for etherrhine which tries to recover better
> > 	from errors and tries to optimise packet copies
>
> Does this mean that vt6102-based adapters are a good choice in
> a Plan 9 machine?  It's time I replaced my last remaining 10mb/s
> card.
>
> -- Richard

not my first choice, they still require more copying that other
adapters. i'm not sure what's out there in the low-end add-in
card market. the realtek 8169 works ok but i've only seen those
cards in japan.

--jim