Re: [9fans] fossil+fossi=suicide

[David Presotto <presotto@closedmind.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 31 bytes --]

rm /srv/unprotected works fine.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3250 bytes --]

From: andrey mirtchovski <mirtchov@cpsc.ucalgary.ca>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil+fossi=suicide
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:32:34 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311261420070.12183-100000@fbsd.cpsc.ucalgary.ca>

Is it possible to 'undo' the srv command? Say if a script is used to run
replica it could tell fossil to create /srv/replica with -AWP, run pull,
remove /srv/replica and tell fossil to remove the posted fd.

Running replica on an -AWP-ed fossil fd is really preferable, since things
like yesterday permissions changes just don't work in a situation where
I do a pull with my user being a member of the sys group. In my case
replica was unable to modify the permissions of the files in antiword/
because they are owned by my user locally and by sys on sources, so
fossil wouldn't allow a chmod.

andrey

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, David Presotto wrote:

> with the new fossil (after you get past your linker problems) you can say
> 'fsys main srv -AWP unprotected' (actually pick your own name).  This
> will create a /srv/unprotected for the same file system you are currently
> using.  You can then mount that and use it to get unprotected access.