From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: peter huang <peter_huang@hp.com>
Message-ID: <aac0gp$8he$1@web1.cup.hp.com>
References: <20020426145434.68DA319A2D@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] text editor
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:59:12 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7bb974f6-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Can you elaborate on the differences?  What part is real painful?  I used
wily a lot so I like to know.

-peter
<anothy@cosym.net> wrote in message
news:20020426145434.68DA319A2D@mail.cse.psu.edu...
> i've used Wily for quite a bit (although not for a good while now)
> and found the differences and inconsistancies to be really painful.
> i imagine it'd still be a good step up for someone not already
> familiar with acme. the acme-in-inferno-on-unix solution is one
> i use occasionally now (since i'm only occasionally at a unix box)
> and really like.
>
> since my unix boxes are generally remote, i edit files on them most
> of the time by 9fs'ing (using u9fs on the unix box) and running
> acme. occasionally i have to edit files on a box i don't admin (and
> thus can't put u9fs on), and sam -r works well for that. even that's
> somewhat awkward (to be polite) now... i _really_ miss acme's
> mouse chording.
> ?