From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:24:23 +0900 From: underspecified To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <922b610f917e15678e287488acf26e31@csplan9.rit.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] sad commentary Topicbox-Message-UUID: cc464fda-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 This is actually something I am very interested in as well. If a persistent version of Acme (-SAC) was available it would completely obviate my use of screen. Would something like this be feasible outside of Octopus as well? --underspecified On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Tim Wiess wrote: >>> this slashdot article almost asks for cpu >>> functionality for plan 9 by name. >>> >>> http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/08/06/29/1417247.shtml >>> >>> not a single mention of plan 9. i hope >>> this is an indication that slashdot has >>> slipped. >>> >>> screens? 1978 called and wants its >>> terminal server mentality back. >>> >>> - erik >> >> cpu is not persistent, at least not in the way >> he wants it. > > Yeah, seems like the poster is more interested in something similar to > what Octopus give you. > > >