From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <abaf4de0cf89d7c71b1105f2052ff91d@terzarima.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:33:39 +0100
In-Reply-To: <13426df10807100818g491f676fwf5f2256f710f0583@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e1757caa-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> speaking of which, did Cinap's  fixes for the gs segment make it in so
> we have thread local storage a la linux now?

plan 9 provides that portably as the stack segment,
and provides some reserved space in it via _privates [see exec(2)].
(it might be helpful to have some conventions for its use.)

or did you mean in linuxemu?