From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:53:07 -0400 To: a@9srv.net, 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <97DD3287-6CCF-45F0-A2EE-30CBBF61D509@9srv.net> References: <011b9189eff1a19b0e074faf782dd598@coraid.com> <10d878ecf07027f04938fb4353c8b080@brasstown.quanstro.net> <97DD3287-6CCF-45F0-A2EE-30CBBF61D509@9srv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Regarding 9p based "protocols" message framing Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6da4a072-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > I'd love to have an IP-free, 9p-capable network in the mix. Plan 9 > had this, way back when, with "nonet" (?), but that didn't survive > the removal of the streams system in the 3rd edition (I know you > know this already,but I'm not sure how widely it's known). i'm probablly missing something, but i don't see why your lan couldn't be ip-free. you may have to have a sacrifical super-nat machine that transplants, say, ssh/nonet onto ssh/ip. the more plan 9-y way would be to import the gateway. i'm not sure which would be more elegant. - erik