From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sun,  2 Oct 2011 15:18:48 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <ad29e1285ba7700a6545bc2d8e3d8fa5@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <20111002191431.D7DA7B852@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <20111002163800.GA12773@polynum.com>
	<20111002175227.2D7F1B856@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<be876586eb3f06dd82a1578d2b964fe6@coraid.com>
	<20111002184015.CD088B852@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<1a3de3d2869ab078c9a4fdf9bce44982@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<20111002191431.D7DA7B852@mail.bitblocks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] circular fonctions: precision?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2fac6af2-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> > that wasn't my reading of the spec.  so you're saying that if
> > the iterative algorithm loops 53 times, it's free to return any
> > answer whatever and still be compliant?
>
> That was my reading (but it was a long time ago and I am not a
> numerical analyst lawyer. So caveat emptor. You get what you
> pay for. etc.) But if you expect to sell your library
> presumably you'd care about the quality of impementation!

F00F!

- erik