From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ad37948d319af199f27ec1c1f8658d70@akira.nop.cx>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: Tim Wiess <tim@nop.cx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:17:19 -0700
In-Reply-To: <56da2399546edb81be5482c2f5bc6e08@hera.eonet.ne.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx vs drawterm
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ed30dc88-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>> The advantage of 9vx over drawterm, for me, is that 9vx
>> doesn't require a cpu server.
>
> You are not using Plan 9 anymore then, rather you are using something
> similar to Plan 9.
>
> I felt that Plan 9 is abused by 9vx, which I felt at first glance, but
> at that time I didn't want to say this...
>
> I prefer drawterm because it stands in the Plan 9 world.

While I haven't yet gotten the chance to play with it, personally I
felt 9vx is really a normal P9 terminal, whereas drawterm is not.
Because it doesn't run natively makes no difference.