From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <adc5c3e3de1033d8a9a43c0fa7bbcd1d@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:50:41 -0400
To: fernanbolando@mailc.net, 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <1d5d51400906220920n58d465c2kf5794d878416b583@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] p9p vac issue
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0db1a7de-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> looks like it's related to the error above. you might want to downgrade to
> http://swtch.com/plan9port/plan9port-20090609.tgz

fortune tells me

The most effective debugging tool is still careful thought,
coupled with judiciously placed print statements.
	-Kernighan, 1978

i don't think this bug is going to be fixed without a
bit of actual debugging.  since your theories are rather
easy to test, i would think it would be much easier to
arrive at a solution via a frontal assault bwk style, rather
than sniping at it from the safety of the mailing list.

i promise, vac won't shoot back.  even if you pull out
gdb.

i'm interested in what the actual bug is.

- erik