From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <add2d095331447adf8ce9de9f0388ad9@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:49:00 -0500
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za, 9fans@9fans.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] nat
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4633f4aa-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Running NAT at user level would, assuming I'm not totally off base, be
> quite expensive and the hardware on which it runs would have to be
> pretty powerful.

most people have plenty of power to spare on their cpu
servers and feeding a dsl modem at < 10mbit/sec is really
trivial these days.  were you thinking of natting >1gbit?

- erik