From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ae9f937a18a4dca14c161bd0f80f5c74@csplan9.rit.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Sparc
Date: Mon,  6 Aug 2007 03:35:44 -1000
From: john@csplan9.rit.edu
In-Reply-To: <46B721B4.4020103@xware.cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9f49d9b2-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

<snip>
> And to be honest, you'd be better off with an i386 or sparcv9, in which 
> case you'd be trying to use Newsham's sparc64 port, not sparc32.
<snip>

So what's the status on Newsham's sparc64 port? I've got an Ultra 1 lying
around, but if the wiki is still up to date, the port only supports Ultra 2's.
Has there been more progress made since the wiki was last updated?
Thanks


John